Rasputin.com tells us what Walter E. Williams has to say about so-called "price gouging". This is a great article.
Let's start off with an example. Say you owned a small 10-pound inventory of coffee that you purchased for $3 a pound. Each week you'd sell me a pound for $3.25. Suppose a freeze in Brazil destroyed half of its coffee crop, causing the world price of coffee to immediately rise to $5 a pound. You still have coffee that you purchased before the jump in prices. When I stop by to buy another pound of coffee from you, how much will you charge me? I'm betting that you're going to charge me at least $5 a pound. Why? Because that's today's cost to replace your inventory.
(...)
If you were really enthusiastic about not being a "price-gouger," I'd have another proposition. You might own a house that you purchased for $55,000 in 1960 that you put on the market for a half-million dollars. I'd simply accuse you of price-gouging and demand that you sell me the house for what you paid for it, maybe adding on a bit for inflation since 1960. I'm betting you'd say, "Williams, if I sold you my house for what I paid for it in 1960, how will I be able to pay today's prices for a house to live in?
those are two very good posts. I've always found accounts of price-gouging to be specious, at best. What business is it of anyone to assert that the price of my gasoline is too high? It's my fucking gasoline, isn't it. I don't have to sell it to anyone. You're not doing me a favor when you buy my gasoline, I'm doing you a favor by selling it.
ReplyDelete:)
The same Greenies who whine about pollution are cursing at the pump with their big SUVs.
ReplyDeleteNot owning a car, I have the right to feel inherently superior.
I want to buy a $100 item with that million dollar bill and get $999,900 in change, all in Franklins.
ReplyDelete